Megan’s practice focuses on patent infringement litigation.

She represents clients in a variety of technological fields, particularly in the pharmaceutical and chemical arts. Her experience also includes inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. Megan has been involved in all phases of litigation, including fact discovery, motions practice, discovery, trial, and appeal.

Prior to attending law school, Megan worked as a research and development chemist for a specialty chemical manufacturer, developing new synthetic products and optimizing existing manufacturing processes.

Megan has been included in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch for her patent litigation work.

Experience

Member of a team that served as co-lead counsel for plaintiffs in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) patent infringement cases in the District of Delaware involving UCB’s Vimpat® drug for the treatment of epilepsy. UCB, Inc. et al. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 13-1206-LPS (D. Del.)

Represented Recro Gainesville LLC as a member of a lead counsel team in patent infringement cases in the District of Delaware involving Zohydro® ER, an extended release hydrocodone formulation. Recro Gainesville LLC v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., C.A. No. 14-1118-GMS (D. Del.) and Recro Gainesville LLC v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd., C.A. No. 14-1364-GMS (D. Del.)

Represented Recro Gainesville LLC in defendant’s appeal of Recro Gainesville LLC v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., C.A. No. 14-1118-GMS (D. Del.).  Recro Gainesville LLC v. Actavis Labs. FL, Inc., No. 2017-1822 (Fed. Cir.)

Represented medical device manufacturer Edwards Lifesciences Corporation in patent infringement action in the District of Delaware. Boston Sci. Corp. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp., C.A. No. 16-275-SLR (D. Del.)

Represented Edwards Lifesciences Corporation in related IPR proceedings concerning transcatheter heart valve technology.  Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., IPR2017-00060

Represented Agilent Technologies and Aurora SFC Systems, Inc. as a member of a lead counsel team in patent infringement action on liquid chromatography systems. Waters Techs. Corp. v. Aurora SFC Sys. Inc., C.A. No. 11-708-RGA (D. Del.)

Worked on behalf of defendants Sprint and Simplexity as lead counsel and also represented HTC in patent infringement case in the District of Delaware. EON Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. FLO TV Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10-812-RGA (D. Del.)

Represented Sprint in plaintiff’s appeal of EON Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. FLO TV Inc., et al., C.A. No. 10-812-RGA (D. Del.). EON Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2014-1392 (Fed. Cir.)

Member of lead counsel team representing Sprint in multi-defendant patent litigation in the District of Delaware. CallWave Communications, LLC v. Sprint Nextel Corp. & Google, C.A. No. 12-1702-RGA (D. Del.)

Represented Rite Aid as a member of a lead counsel team and also represented CVS in patent infringement case involving refill-by-scan mobile applications for use with iPhones and Android devices. Walgreen Co. v. Rite Aid Corp., C.A. No. 14-124-GMS (D. Del.)

News & Insights

Professional & Civic

American Bar Association

Delaware State Bar Association

Federal Bar Association

Education

University of Virginia School of Law, JD, order of the coif, 2012
Virginia Law Review, executive editor, 2011-2012; editorial board member, 2010-2011

College of William & Mary, BS, Chemistry, summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, 2005

Admissions

  • Delaware, 2012
  • US District Court for the District of Delaware, 2013
  • US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2014
Jump to Page

We use cookies on this website to improve functionality and performance, to analyze traffic to the website, and to enable social media features. By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.